Perlindungan Konsumen bagi Siswa Sekolah Menengah terhadap Pembuatan Buku Tahunan yang Tidak Sesuai dengan Perjanjian
Abstract
Based on research entitled "Consumer Protection for Middle School Students Against Making Yearbooks That Are Not In Accordance with the Agreement" with the aim of describing legal remedies that students can take to be able to cancel agreements that do not meet the proficient requirements and to describe consumer protection for high school students in carrying out making yearbooks that are not in accordance with the agreement. The research method used is normative legal research related to the applicable law (positive law) in the form of laws and regulations related to underage agreements. The results of the study show that legal remedies that can be taken by high school students to cancel agreements that do not fulfill the legal requirements of agreements can be resolved by means of non-litigation channels first, if no agreement or decision is reached, then they can be resolved through litigation, namely the court. Cancellation can be done because it relates to non-fulfillment of the subjective terms of the agreement, therefore the agreement can be canceled with a 'voidable' lawsuit which results in a constitutive decision. The form of preventive legal protection by the government has not been strictly regulated in Indonesia, therefore preventive protection is needed regarding legal awareness of high school students. Meanwhile, in a repressive manner, the law has provided protection with steps that can be taken, namely making a complaint to the BPSK (Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency) which has been regulated in article 49 paragraph 1 of Law No. 18 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. Therefore, if there is a similar case, you can make a complaint to BPSK
References
Ahmadi, M., & Sakka, P. (2008). Hukum Perikatan (Penjelasan Makna Pasal 1233 Sampai 1456 BW). Rajagarfindo Perdasa. Jakarta.
Artadi, I. K., & Putra, D. R. A. (2010). Implementasi Ketentuan–Ketentuan Dalam Hukum Perjanjian ke Dalam Perancangan Kontrak. Denpasar: Udayana University Pres.
Badrulzaman, M. D., Sjahdeini, S. R., Soepraptomo, H., Djamil, F., & Soenandar, T. (2001). Kompilasi hukum perikatan. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Budiardjo, M. (2003). Dasar-dasar ilmu politik. Gramedia pustaka utama.
Gazali, D. S., & Usman, R. (2012). Hukum Perbankan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 271.
Hanintijo, R. S. (2002). Metode Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri. Ghalia Indonesia: bandung.
Harahap, M. Y. (2019). Segi-Segi Hukum Perjanjian, Bandung: PT. Alumni.
Miru, A. (2020). Hukum Perikatan penjelasan makna pasal 1233 sampai 1456 BW.
Miru, A., & Yodo, S. (2011). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen, Cetakan Ketujuh. Penerbit. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada. Jakarta.
Nasution, A. (1995). Hukum perlindungan konsumen: Suatu pengantar.
Nelson-Jones, R. (2010). Theory and practice of counselling and therapy. Sage.
PNH Simanjuntak, S. H. (2017). Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Kencana.
Prawirohamidjojo, R. S. (1988). Pluralisme Dalam Perundang-Undangan Perkawinan di Indonesia (Surabaya. Airlangga University Press.
R Subekti, S. H. (2021). Pokok-pokok hukum perdata. PT. Intermasa.
Saputra, S. L. (2019). Status Kekuatan Hukum Terhadap Perjanjian Dalam Jual Beli Online Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak Dibawah Umur. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 3(2), 199–216.
Subekti, D., Lesmana, M., Tjaniadi, P., Safari, N., Frazier, E., Simanjuntak, C., Komalarini, S., Taslim, J., Campbell, J. R., & Oyofo, B. A. (2002). Incidence of Norwalk-like viruses, rotavirus and adenovirus infection in patients with acute gastroenteritis in Jakarta, Indonesia. FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology, 33(1), 27–33.
Suharnoko, H. P. (2004). Teori dan Analisa Kasus. Jakarta, Kencana Prenada Media.
Supriadi. (2007). Hukum agraria. Sinar Grafika.
Widjaja, G. (2007). Seri Hukum Bisnis: Memahami Prinsip Keterbukaan dalam Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.
