Mini Group Discussion: Cooperative Learning in Teaching Reading
Abstract
The aim of the research is to determine mini-group discussion as a cooperative learning in teaching reading. In the article, the method used is quantitative and descriptive qualitative which focus on teaching reading English text of Unhasy Students non-English department. It focus on some problems, those are How the implementation of mini group discussion (mindis) in teaching reading English and How the influence of (Mindis) into students’ ability in reading English comprehension. The researcher used test as an instrument and interview of the students. The result of the research are Mindis is easy to teach reading English in non-English department and it has significant influence into the students' ability in reading English.
References
Brown, H. D. (2004). Teaching by Principles. New York: Longman.Churiyah,Faridatul, Retno Tri Hastutik. 2017. SMALL GROUP DISCUSSION METHOD IN TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION IN EIGHT GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP N 3 BANTUL IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2017/2018
Creswell, John W. 2010. Research Design:Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. California: Sage Publications, Inc McMillan J.H.
Girsa, Ahmad & Yulianti,Dita. (2018) Effective Methode of Teaching Reading (study case).Journal Bahasa Lingua Scientia vol 10(2) 275 November 2018
Grabe, William and Fredricka L. Stoller. 2011. Teaching and Researching Reading. London: Pearson Education Limited.
Johnson, D., Johnson, R., Roseth, C., & Shin, T. 2014. The relationship between motivation and achievement in interdependent situation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12280
Lexy J. Moleong. 2014. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung
Manurrung, Paisal, Hari Sambayu. 2017 Meningogram Studi katkan Kemampuan Bahasa Inggris Mahasiswa/I Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris FKIP-UNA dengan Literature Aproach.Prosiding Seminar NasionalMulti Disiplin Ilmu UNA.
Ningsih, Nur Hadi (2017). SMALL GROUP DISCUSSION METHOD IN TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION IN EIGHT GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP N 3 BANTUL IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2017/2018
Roseth, C., Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. 2008. Promoting early adolescents’ achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 223-246.
Saputra, Ahadi. 2016. The use of Two Stay Two Stray Strategy in Teaching Reading. Rnglish Educatin Journal 7(2), 219-232, April 2016
Slavin, R. 2014. Cooperative learning and academic achievement: Why does groupwork work? Anales De Psicologia, 30, 785-791.
Slavin, R., Lake, C., Hanley, P. & Thurston, A. 2014. Experimental evaluations of elementary science programs: A best-evidence synthesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51, 870-901.
Wall, H. (2014). When Guided Reading Isn’t Working: Strategies for Effective Instruction. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 10(2), 1–8. Retrieved from http://jolle.coe.uga.edu
Yulianti,Dita.(2014) Thesis: Improving the English Comprehension Ability of Grade 8 Students at SMP NEGERI 3 GEDANGSARI in the Academic Year of 2013/2014 through Extensive Reading Activities
