Penerapan Portfolio Assessment untuk Kepentingan Guru Mensinyalir Bakat Siswa Ditinjau dari Sekolah Negeri dan Swasta
Abstract
This study aims to determine the extent of the implementation of portfolio assessment in public and private schools, the difficulty of implementing portfolio assessment based on the teacher's perspective. This research was conducted using a qualitative descriptive approach. The data collection process was carried out in three stages, namely observation, interviews, and documentation. Meanwhile, at the data analysis stage, the researcher utilized data from the results of observation, interviews, and documentation, and then followed up with 3 stages, namely; data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The informants of this study were 3 teachers at each SMA N 5 City of Tidore Islands, YASMU High School, and SMA 8 City Tidore Islands. The results showed that there were differences in the implementation of portfolio assessment between schools with state status and schools with private status. In public schools, the implementation of portfolio assessment is more effective and programmed so that the learning outcomes and talents of students are more easily recognized and guided on an ongoing basis, while in private schools it is not. Difficulties in implementation are more likely in private schools caused by external and internal factors.
References
Bundu, P. (2017). Asesmen Autentik Dalam Pembelajaran. (Ed.1, Cet.1). Yogyakarta: Deepublish, November 2017.
Danielson, C. & McGreal, T. (2000). Teacher Evaluation: To Enhance Professional Practice. USA. ETS.
Depdiknas, (2003). Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Depdiknas, (2005). Peraturan Pemerintah RI Nomor 19 Tahun 2005 Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Jakarta: Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan.
Febriana, R. (2019). Kompetensi Guru. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Haribowo, H. (2000). Portfolio assessment (Portfolio Assessment). Pelangi Pendidikan: Bulletin Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan Menengah Umum. No.1. Volume 2.
Lam, R. (2018). Portfolio Assessment for The Teaching and Learning of Writing. Singapore: Springer.
Macalister, J. (2010). Language Curiculum Design: ESL and Applied Linguistics Professional Series. New York: Routledge
Maesuri, S. (2002). Penilaian Performens dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. (Ed). Malang: Jurnal Matematika atau Pembelajarannya.
O”Malley, M. J., dan Pierce, V.L. (1992). Performance and Portfolio Assessment for Language Minority Students.
Purwanto, E. S. (2006). Penggunaan Model Assessment Portfolio dalam Penilaian Proses dan Hasil Belajar Program Linear. No.1/XXV/2006.
Slameto, 2010. Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Suherman, E. (2007). ASESMEN PORTOFOLIO. EDUCARE, 5(1). Retrieved from http://jurnal.fkip.unla.ac.id/index.php/educare/article/view/52
Wolf, P. D. (1991). Developing Minds: A Resource Book For Teaching Thinking. Portfolio Assessement: Sampling Student Work. United State of Amreika: Association for sSupervision and Curriculum Development A