Penerapan Teknik Participatory Rural Appraisal (Pra) Dalam Menangani Permasalahan Lingkungan di Desa Sukamaju Kabupaten Sukabumi

  • Aulia Putri UIN Jakarta
  • Elma Meidiana Rahmah Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
  • Hanny Rifanela Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
  • Nazla Bunga Qonita Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
  • Tawfiqurrohman Tawfiqurrohman Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Keywords: Garbage, Socialization, Participation, Participatory Rural Appraisal Technique

Abstract

The living environment should be the most comfortable place for each
individual. But in fact there are several factors that can affect comfortness,
one of which is environmental problems. To find causes and effects as well
as solutions to these problems, of course, requires direct participation
from the community. The Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) technique
can be an approach that can be used and open a discussion forum in the
community so that they can participate in voicing their opinions about
problems that exist in their living environment. Desa Sukamaju,
Kecamatan Kadudampit, Kabupaten Sukabumi, Provinsi Jawa Barat was
chosen as the location for researchers to carry out PRA activities. The
research method used in this research is qualitative action research. From
the results of the discussion forum held with the community, it was found
that the waste problem was ranked first. This is concluded through the
PRA technique of pohon masalah, matriks ranking, and pemetaan desa.
For these problems, education about ecobricks and socialization on waste
management was held as a solution to the waste problem in Desa
Sukamaju.

References

Adimihardja, K., & Hikmat, H. (2003). PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH APPRAISAL: dalam Pelaksanaan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat. Penerbit Humaniora. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=en&lr=&id=39a8DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=%22kusnaka+adimihardja%22&ots=KQR1s-3nhw&sig=45twGTK612sQwKBLJpwWlg7jLNI&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22kusnaka adimihardja%22&f=false

Chambers. (1996). Participatory Rural Appraisal: Memahami Desa Secara Partisipatif. Oxam – Kanisius.

Chambers, R. (1994). Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): Analysis of experience. World Development, 22(9), 1253–1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(94)90003-5

Corraliza, J. A., & Collado, S. (2019). ECOLOGICAL AWARENESS AND CHILDREN’S ENVIRONMENTAL EXPERIENCE. Psychologist Paper, Vol. 40. https://repositorio.uam.es/bitstream/handle/10486/691266/ecological_corraliza_PP_2019.pdf?sequence=1

Dosen Sosiologi. (2021). 6 Cara Membuat Pohon Masalah dan Pohon Tujuan Serta Contohnya. https://dosensosiologi.com/pohon-masalah-pohon-tujuan/

Galih Pradana, A., & Nita, S. (2019). Rancang Bangun Game Edukasi “AMUDRA” Alat Musik Daerah Berbasis Android. Jurnal Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi 2019, 2(1), 49–53.

Lestari, M. A., Santoso, M. B., & Nandang, M. (2020). PENERAPAN TEKNIK PARTICIPATORY RURAL APPRAISAL (PRA) DALAM MENANGANI PERMASALAHAN SAMPAH. Prosiding Penelitian & Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 7, 513–519.

Lindungi Hutan. (2022). Lingkungan Adalah: Pengertian Para Ahli, Jenis dan Manfaat. https://lindungihutan.com/blog/lingkungan-adalah/

Muhsin, Ahmad, & Dkk. (2018). Participatory Rural Apparaisal (PRA) for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Deepublish.

Ni putu DK. (2016). Teknik dan Alat PRA. https://ndkbluefin.wordpress.com/2016/05/27/kajian-keadaan-pedesaan-secara-partisipatif/

Sutirto, T. W., & Supariadi. (2017). Pengelolaan Lingkungan Desa Wisata Berwawasan Go Green di Kawasan Gunung Lawu. Cakra Wisata, 18(1), 26–37.

Yudha, V. (2019). Participatory Rural Appraisal Dalam Praktik Desa Wisata | Desa Bisa. https://www.desabisa.com/participatory-rural-appraisal-dalam-praktik-desa-wisata/

Published
2022-10-24
How to Cite
Putri, A., Rahmah, E., Rifanela, H., Qonita, N., & Tawfiqurrohman, T. (2022). Penerapan Teknik Participatory Rural Appraisal (Pra) Dalam Menangani Permasalahan Lingkungan di Desa Sukamaju Kabupaten Sukabumi. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 8(20), 378-385. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7243114