Pengaruh Kepuasan Kerja Terhadap Motivasi Kerja Perangkat Desa Se Kecamatan Pineleng

  • Devie S.R. Siwij Universitas Negeri Manado

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out whether job satisfaction has an effect on the motivation of village employees in Pineleng Sub-district, Minahasa Regency, and to find out how much job satisfaction has an effect on work motivation in village staff in Pineleng District, Minahasa Regency. In this study, I use a quantitative research approach, which uses data that can be calculated to produce a strong quantitative interpretation, with the variables (X) “Job satisfaction” and (Y) “Employee Work Motivation” village officials in Pineleng District, Minahasa Regency. The results showed that 82.9.1 % Job Satisfaction (X) determines Work Motivation (Y) Pineleng Dua Indah Equipment, Pineleng District. Meanwhile, 17.1% of work motivation is influenced by other factors not examined. When viewed based on the research data obtained, it can be said that the Job Satisfaction of the Pineleng Dua Indah Village apparatus, Pineleng District is 55.78%, which means that the implementation has not been maximized. This shows that there are 43.22% of current work motivation is not derived from job satisfaction. The lack of job satisfaction of the Pineleng Dua Indah village apparatus is more triggered by the lack of appreciation for the work felt by the village apparatus. Work Motivation of Pinelang Dua Indah Village Staff is 61.01% or in other words there are 39.91% of village officials still lacking motivation.

References

Abdullah, Syukur.1984. Aspek Kepemimpinan Dalam Birokrasi (Pengembangan Kemampuan Administrasi Dalam Menunjang Pembangunan Nasional. Ujung Pandang: Persadi.

Adair, John, 2008. Kepemimpinan yang Memotivasi. Penerbit PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.

Arep Ishak & Tanjung Hendri, 2003, manajemen Motivasi. Jakrta: PT. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

Fernet, Claude, Guay, Frederic, Senecal, Caroline, dan Austin, Stephanie. 2012. Predicting Intraindividual Changes in Teacher Burnout : The Role of Perceived School Environment and Motivational Factors. Journal Homepage, (Online),(Terjemahan)

Handoko, T. Hani. 2001.Manajemen.EdisiKedua. Yogyakarta: BPFF

Harbani, Pasolong. 2008. Kepemimpinan Birokrasi, Bandung : CV.Alfabeta.

Hariandja, Marihot Tua Efendi. 2002. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia: Pengadaan, Pengembangan, Pengkompensasian, dan Peningkatan Produktivitas Pegawai. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Hasibuan, Malayu S.P, 2003, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi Revisi,. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.

Kuswadi. (2004). Cara Mengukur Kepuasan Karyawan. PT Elex Media Komputindo, Jakarta.

Luthans, Fred. (2006). Perilaku organisasi. Edisi 10. ANDI, Yogyakarta.

Mangkunegara, 2004. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan.PT Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung.

Riadi, Edi. 2016. Satatistik Penelitian (Analisis manual dan IBM SPSS). ANDI Yogyakarta.

Riduwan dan Sunarto. (2004). Pengantar Statistik Penelitian Pendidikan, Sosial, Ekonomi, Komunikasi, dan Bisnis. Bandung. Alfabeta.

Rivai, Veithzal. 2011, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Perusahaan: dari Teori ke Praktik,Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada

Robbins, Stephen, 2006, “Perilaku Organisasi”, Prentice Hall, edisi kesepuluh Sabardini, 2006, “Peningkatan Kinerja Melalui Perilaku Kerja Berdasarkan Kecerdasan Emosional”, Telaah Bisnis, Vol.7, No.1.

Siagian, S.P. (2007). Kiat Meningkatkan Produktivitas Kerja. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Supardi dan Anwar. 2004. Motivasi Kerja. Puri Arsita Anam. Yogyakarta

Uno, Hamzah (2006), Teori Motivasi dan Pengukurannya Analisis Di BidangPendidikan. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara

Winardi, 2007 , Manajemen Kinerja, Jakarta, PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Published
2022-11-15
How to Cite
Siwij, D. (2022). Pengaruh Kepuasan Kerja Terhadap Motivasi Kerja Perangkat Desa Se Kecamatan Pineleng. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 8(22). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7323192