Pengaruh Metode Hypnoteaching Terhadap Minat Belajar Siswa Kelas 5 Sekolah Dasar
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine whether the Hypnoteacing Method Affects the Learning Interest of Grade V Students at SDN II Tomohon, Matani, Tomohon Tengah Sub-district, and to find out how much influence the Hypnoteacing Method has on the Learning Interest of Grade V students at the State Elementary School II Tomohon. This study uses a questionnaire consisting of questions that are used to collect data related to the Social Competence variable. Documentation method is used to retrieve data about learning achievement which can be seen from the value of learning outcomes in the form of values from report cards. The implementation of direct learning in class V of the State Elementary School 2 Kakaskasen Tomohon City was considered good before the Covid19 Pandemic. In fact, all indicators are in the good category. The highest indicator in the application of the direct learning model is 'Providing training and guidance' with an average score of 4.18. while the indicator with the lowest score of 3.47 is 'the existence of education'. Students' learning motivation is in the good category in participating in direct learning, this is evidenced by all the indicators in the good category. The highest indicator on the variable of learning motivation of fifth graders at the State Elementary School II Kakaskasen Tomohon City is 'the desire and desire to succeed' with an average value of 4.10 and the lowest variable is Diligent in carrying out tasks' with an average value of 3.49. The application of the direct learning model has a positive and significant effect on increasing the learning motivation of grade V students at the State Elementary School 2 Kakaskasen, Tomohon City in mathematics.
References
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 1990. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara
Hadi, Sutrisno. 2000. Analisis Regresi. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset
Hamalik, Oemar. 2003. Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Hasbullah. 2009. Dasar – Dasar Ilmu Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja grafindo Persada.
Hasibuan, Malayu. 2001. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Miftah Thoha, 1999. Kepemimpinan Dalam Manajemen Suatu Pendekatan Prilaku, Jakarta : PT. Grafindo Persada
Monty P. Satiadarma dan Fidelis E. Waruwu. 2003. Mendidik Kecerdasan: Pedoman Bagi Orang Tua dan Guru Dalam Mendidik Anak Cerdas. Jakarta Pustaka Populer Obor.
Mulyasa E., 2001. Menjadi Kepala Sekolah Profesional, Bandung : PT. Remaja
Noehi Nasution. 1993. Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta : PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Reksoprodjo Handoko, 1994. Organisasi Perusahaan Teori Struktur dan Perilaku, Yogyakarta : BPFE
Sardiman, A.M. 2001. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo
Slameto. (2015). Belajar Dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: RinekaCipta.
Slameto. 2003. Belajar dan Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Soebagyo Atmodiwiro, 2003. Manajemen Pendidikan Indonesia, (Jakarta : Ardadizya Jaya
Soetjipto, Raflis Kosasi, 2007. Profesi Keguruan, Jakarta : Rineka CiptaArikunto, Suharsimi. 1990. Manajemen Pengajaran Secara Manusiawi. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta
Sugiyono. 2002. Metode Penelitian Administrasi. Bandung: CV. Alfabet
Suharno. 2008. Prinsip-prinsip Dasar Kebijakan Pablik. Yogyakarta : UNY Press.
Susetyo , Budi2010. Statistika Untuk Analsis Data Penelitian. Reflika Aditama, Bandung.
Syah, Muhibin. 1995. Perkembangan Pendidikan. Bandung: Rosdakarya
Syaripudin & Kurniasih, 2008. Pedagogik Teoritis.Bandung, Percikan Ilmu
Yusuf, Syamsu. 2011. Psikologi Perkembangan Anak dan Remaja. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya