Rekonstruksi Pemikiran Hakim dalam Mewujudkan Supremasi Moral Justice
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to find out how the judge profession thinks in realizing the supremacy of moral justice and what factors lead to violations of the code of ethics of the judge profession. Judges have a central role in ensuring justice and law run well. In carrying out their duties, judges must maintain the consistency of their decisions and accommodate changes in legal values and a sense of justice that occur in people's lives. The judge must also understand that his position is transcendental and acts as a guardian of cosmic balance. Therefore, judges must strengthen their thinking in realizing the supremacy of moral justice. Reconstruction of judges' thoughts can help realize the supremacy of moral justice by maintaining the consistency of judges' decisions in upholding law and justice, accommodating changes in legal values and a sense of justice that occur in people's lives, and increasing judges' understanding of the meaning of the supremacy of moral justice and its role in make it happen. In addition, judges must also develop a progressive law-based mindset to deal with social changes and values that develop in society. In realizing the supremacy of moral justice, judges must understand that their position has a great responsibility in maintaining justice and law in society. Therefore, judges must strengthen their thinking in realizing the supremacy of moral justice by maintaining the consistency of decisions, accommodating changes in legal values and a sense of justice, and increasing understanding of the meaning of the supremacy of moral justice and its role in realizing it. Thus, the reconstruction of judges' thinking can help realize the supremacy of moral justice and maintain justice and law in society.
References
Garner, B A. (1999). Black’ Law Dictionary. Edisi ke-7. West Group. St. Paul Minn.
Raharo, S. (2009). Hukum Progresif Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia. Genta Publishing. Yogyakarta.
Ananda, S. (2008). Hukum dan Moralitas. FH Unpar. Bandung.
Kartiwan, I. (2017). Supremasi Pemikiran Hakim dalam Mewujudkan Supremasi Moral Justice. Diakses pada 20 Juni 2023 dari https://badilag.mahkamahagung.go.id/artikel/publikasi/artikel/rekonstruksi- pemikiran-hakim-dalam-mewujudkan-supremasi-moral-justice-oleh-ahmad- satiri-11-10
Marwati, R. (2018). Pengawasan terhadap Integritas Hakim Konsitusi dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan di Indonesia. Diakses pada 20 Juni 2023 dari https://www.mkri.id/index.php?id=94&page=download.Penelitian
M. Syamsudin. (2011) Rekonstruksi Pola Pikir Hakim dalam Memutuskan Perkara Korupsi Berbasis Hukum Progresif. Diakases pada 20 Juni 2023 dari https://dinamikahukum.fh.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/JDH/article/viewFile/11/20
Azim. (2021). Implementasi Hukum Islam Progresif dalam Putusan Pengadilan Agama. Diakses pada 20 JUni 2023 dari https://badilag.mahkamahagung.go.id/artikel/publikasi/artikel/implementasi- hukum-islam-progresif-dalam-putusan-pengadilan-agama
Cahyono. (2022). Terobosan Hakim dalam Mengadili Hard Cases Dalam Menuju Keadilan Yang Progresif Melalui Judicial Advisme. Diakses pada 20 Juni 2023 dari https://pn- bandaaceh.go.id/trobosan-hakim-dalam-mengadili-hard-cases-melalui-judicial- activism/
Muliyawan. (2021). Paradigma Hukum Progresif. Diakses pada 21 Juni 2023 dari https://www.pn-palopo.go.id/index.php/media-center/artikel/184-paradigma- hukum-progresif
Kodir, A. (2019). Paradigma Hakim Dalam Memutuskan Perkara di Indonesia. Diakses paada 21 JUni 2023 dari https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/hpe/article/download/29178/19852