Meningkatkan Hasil Permainan Egrang Melalui Pendekatan Teknik
Abstract
This research aims to determine the results of the Stilt technique approach to Stilt playing skills in Stilt athletes in Garut district. This research uses an experimental method with a quantitative approach and a One Group Pre Test Post Test research design. The population that the researchers took were stilt athletes from Garut district who had taken part in championships and won the Forkab stilt competition, namely 10 athletes. The sampling technique used Total Sampling so that a total of 10 athletes were sampled. The test instrument used to measure the initial measurement before being given treatment (pretest) and the final measurement after being given treatment (posttest) used a 50 meter running test using stilts. Data analysis used the t test at a significance level of 5%. Results of data analysis using hypothesis testing with a t value of 8.247 and a significance value of 0.000, which shows very low statistical significance (less than the alpha level of 0.05), it can be concluded that there is a significant difference between the results of the stilt game in the initial test and final test. This indicates that the application of a technical approach has a significant impact in improving the results of the stilt game. More specifically, the average stilt performance score in the pretest was higher than in the posttest, indicating a significant increase in performance after implementing this technical approach
References
Ashari, M. A. (2019). Perbandingan Pengaruh Permainan Olahraga Tradisional, Hadang, Terompah Panjang, Egrang Terhadap Peningkatan Daya Tahan, Kecepatan, Dan Keseimbangan Pada Siswa. In Jurnal Penjaskesrek.
Bompa, T., & Haff, G. (2009). Periodization Theory Andmethodology of Training-Tudor O Bompa- Indonesia.Pdf.
Forrest, G. J., Webb, P. I., & Pearson, P. J. (2006). Teaching Games for Understanding (TGFU): A Model for Pre Service Teachers. Wollongong: University of Wollongong., 1–10.
Fortina. (2023). Technical Hand Book Fornas VII 2023 Jawaa Barat. KORMI.
Harsono. (1988). Coaching dan Aspek-aspek Psikologi dalam Coaching. P2LPTK.
Istiningtyas, B., & Setiawan, A. (2022). Upaya menumbuhkembangkan permainan tradisional bakiak dan egrang. Wiyata Dharma: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.30738/wd.v8i2.3695
KOTI. (2019). Panduan Olahraga Tradisional Terompah Panjang, Egrang, Dagongan, Hadang, Sumpitan. KOTI.
KPOTI Pusat. (2022). Peraturan Permainan Olahraga Tradisional. KPOTI.
Madjid, S. D., Umam, C., & Rahmat, A. (2019). Olahraga Tradisional Membangun Karakter Bangsa. Kementrian Pemuda dan olahraga Republik indonesia.
Nurtajudin. (2015). Pengaruh Latihan Koordinasi Mata-Kaki-Tangan Dan Tingkat Keseimbanganterhadap Motorik Kasar Anak Usia Dini. Journal of Physical Education and Sports, 4(2), 154–158. https://doi.org/10.15294/JPES.V4I2.9885
Rumiati. (2021). Analisis Konsep Fisika Energi Mekanik Pada Permainan Tradisional Egrang Sebagai Bahan Pembelajaran Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 9(2), 131. https://doi.org/10.24127/jpf.v9i2.3570
Safari Indra. (2010). Analisis Unsur Fisik Dominan Pada Olahraga Tradisional. Jurnal Kependidikan, 40(2), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v40i2.495
Sagala, H. S. (2009). Kemampuan profesional Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan. Alfabeta.
Sudirjo, E., & Alif, muhamad N. (2019). Filsafat Pendidikan Jasmani.pdf. UPI Sumedang Press.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&DMetode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sukadiyanto. (2005). Model Pembelajaran Kemampuan Koordinasi Pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia, Volume 3(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpji.v3i1.6172
Wibisona, G., Puspita, D., & Rayanti, R. E. (2019). Analisis Gerak Permainan Tradisional Egrang Pada Anak Usia 10-12 Tahun. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kesehatan, November, 36–41.
Yudiana, Y. (2015). Implementasi Model Pendekatan Taktik dan Teknik dalam Pembelajaran Permainan Bola Voli pada Pendidikan Jasmani Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan, 5(1), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.2121/atikan-journal.v5i1.9.g8
