Survey Penerapan Strategi Problem Based Learning (PBL) di SMK Teknologi dan Rekayasa Selama Masa Pandemic Covid-19
Abstract
This study aims to determine the factors that support and hinder the implementation of PBL strategies in online learning in technology and engineering vocational schools during the COVID-19 pandemic. The research method used was a cross sectional survey (Lavrakas, 2008) to draw conclusions about the population of interest (teachers of SMK Negeri 39 Central Jakarta) at one point in time. A total of 12 lecturers of the TAV and TEI expertise programs aged 30 to 53 filled out the questionnaire. The results showed that the supporting factors for implementing the PBL strategy were self-confidence in professional development; understanding of PBL concepts; School management support; and teachers' perceptions of the school environment. Meanwhile, the constraint factors for implementing PBL strategies are lack of confidence in professional development; the notion that it is not important to implement a PBL strategy that can improve performance; and there is no specific guideline for PBL strategy. The findings in this study are the need to strengthen pedagogical competencies, especially in the implementation of PBL strategies, and develop a PBL Strategy Guidebook at SMKN 39 Jakarta.
References
Chian, M. M. , Bridges, S. M. , & Lo, E. C. 2019 The Triple Jump in Problem-Based Learning: Unpacking Principles and Practices in Designing Assessment for Curriculum Alignment. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 13(2).
Collie, R. J., Shapka, J. D., & Perry, N. E. (2012). School cli- mate and social–emotional learning: Predicting teacher stress, job satisfaction, and teaching e cacy. Journal of Educational Psy chology, 104(4), 1189.
Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Go, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L.,& Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
Ertmer, P. A., Glazewski, K. D., Jones, D., Ottenbreit-Le wich, A., Goktas, Y., Collins, K., & Ko caman, A. (2009). Facilitating technology-enhanced problem-based learning (PBL) in the middle school classroom: An exami- nation of how and why teachers adapt. Journal of In teractive Learning Research, 20(1), 35.
Hayenga, A. O., & Corpus, J. H. (2010). Pro les of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: A person-centered approach to motivation and achievement in middle school. Motivation and Emotion, 34(4), 371–383.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2015). Problem-based learning: Goals for learning and strategies for facilitating. In A. Walker, H. Leary, C. E. Hmelo-
Silver, & P. A. Ertmer (Eds.), Essential readings in problem-based learning: Exploring and extending the legacy of Howard S. Barrows (pp. 69–84). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
Kelley, K. W. , Fowlin, J. M. , TawDk, A. A. , & Anderson, M. C. 2019. The Role of Using Formative Assessments in Problem-based Learning: A Health Sciences Education Perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 13(2).
Lam, S. F., Cheng, R. W. Y., & Choy, H. C. (2010). School sup- port and teacher motivation to im plement project-based learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(6), 487–497.
Lavrakas, Paul J.(2008). Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. Thousand Oaks,
Calif.: SAGE Publications. Chian, M. M. , Bridges, S. M. , & Lo, E. C. 2019 The Triple Jump in Problem-Based
Learning: Unpacking Principles and Practices in Designing Assessment for Curriculum Alignment. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 13(2).
Collie, R. J., Shapka, J. D., & Perry, N. E. (2012). School cli- mate and social–emotional learning: Predicting teacher stress, job satisfaction, and teaching e
cacy. Journal of Educational Psy chology, 104(4), 1189.
Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Go, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L.,& Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J. T.
Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
Ertmer, P. A., Glazewski, K. D., Jones, D., Ottenbreit-Le wich, A., Goktas, Y., Collins, K., & Ko caman, A. (2009). Facilitating technology-enhanced problem-based learning (PBL) in the middle school classroom: An exami- nation of how and why teachers adapt. Journal of In teractive Learning Research, 20(1), 35.
Hayenga, A. O., & Corpus, J. H. (2010). Pro les of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: A person-centered approach to motivation and achievement in middle school. Motivation and Emotion, 34(4), 371–383.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2015). Problem-based learning: Goals for learning and strategies for facilitating. In A. Walker, H. Leary, C. E. Hmelo- Silver, & P. A. Ertmer (Eds.), Essential readings in problem-based learning: Exploring and extending the legacy of Howard S. Barrows (pp. 69–84). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
Kelley, K. W. , Fowlin, J. M. , TawDk, A. A. , & Anderson, M. C. 2019. The Role of Using Formative Assessments in Problem-based Learning: A Health Sciences Education Perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 13(2).
Lam, S. F., Cheng, R. W. Y., & Choy, H. C. (2010). School sup- port and teacher motivation to im plement project-based learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(6), 487–497.
Lavrakas, Paul J.(2008). Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE Publications.
Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, compe- tence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self- determination theory to educational practice. teory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133–144.
Ribeiro, L. R. C. (2011). e pros and cons of problem-based learning from the teacher’s standpoint. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 8(1), 4.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic moti vation, social develop- ment, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Overview of self- determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspec- tive. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self- determina tion research (p. 5). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2011). Teacher job satisfac- tion and motivation to leave the teaching profession: Relations with school context, feeling of belonging, and emotional ex haustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(6), 1029–1038.
Sungur, S., & Tekkaya, C. (2006). Effects of problem-based learning and traditional instruction on self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Research, 99(5), 307–320
Walker, C. O., Greene, B. A., & Mansell, R. A. (2006). Iden- ti cation with academics, intrinsic/ extrinsic motivation, and self-e cacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Di erences, 16(1), 1–12.
Watt, H. M., & Richardson, P. W. (2007). Motivational factors influencing teaching as a career choice: Development and validation of the FIT Choice scale. Journal of Experimental Education, 75(3), 167–202.
