Analysis of the Crime of Intentionally Spreading Hateful and Sara Information Through Social Media (Case Study of Decision Number 177/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Jkt.Brt)
Abstract
The application of material criminal law against perpetrators of criminal acts of spreading hatred and sara information through social media is carried out through an integrated criminal justice system involving the police, prosecutors, courts and correctional institutions. Hate speech through social media that causes hostility among groups in society. The act of spreading hate speech through social media is prohibited and punishable in Article 28 paragraph (2) jo Article 45 paragraph (2) of Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning ITE which carries a maximum imprisonment of 6 (six) years. The Panel of Judges in handing down a verdict against the perpetrator of the crime of spreading hatred and sara information through social media in Decision Number 177/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Jkt.Brt. on the spread of hate speech through social media Based on the testimony of witnesses and the testimony of the defendant, the existence of evidence and the facts revealed in court, on the elements of Article 28 paragraph (2) jo Article 45A paragraph (2) of Law No.19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law No.11 of 2008 concerning ITE, the Panel of Judges has correctly argued the elements charged from the Public Prosecutor.
References
Abidin, Andi Zainal. (2007). Hukum Pidana I. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Ali, Mahrus. (2015). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Budhijanto, Danrivanto. (2017). Revolusi Cyberlaw Indonesia (Pembaruan dan Revisi UU ITE No.19 Tahun 2016). Bandung: Reflika Aditama.
Chazawi, Adami. (2011). Pelajaran Hukum Pidana III Percobaan & Penyertaan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Farid, A.Z. Abidin., & Hamzah, Andi. (2017). Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Yasrif Watampone.
Gunakarya, Wildiada. (2012). Kebijakan Kriminal Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Hamzah, Andi. (2001). Bungan Rampai Hukum Pidana dan Acara Pidana. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Hanafi. (1999). Reformasi Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana. Jurnal Hukum, 6(11).
Hartanto. (2019). Hukum Tindak Pidana Khusus. Yogyakarta: CV. Budi Utomo.
Ilyas, Amri., dkk. (2012). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana II. Yogyakarta: Rangka Education.
Kanter, E.Y., & Sianutri, S.R. (2012). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia dan Penerapannya. Jakarta: Storia Grafika.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP).
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).
Lamintang. (1997). Dasar-dasar Hukum pidana Indonesia. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Madiasmo. (2007). Efisiensi Dan Efektivitas. Jakarta: Mega Ersita.
Moeljatno. (1983). Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.
Muladi. (1997). Hak Asasi Manusia, Politik Dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Semarang: Badan Penerbit UNDIP.
Mustofa, Muhammad. (2007). Kriminologi. Jakarta: UI Press.
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Barat Nomor 177/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Jkt.Brt.
Rasyidi, Lili., & Rasyidi, Ira. (2001). Pengantar Filsafat Dan Teori Hukum. Cetakan Ke VIII. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
Rifai, Ahmad. (2011). Penemuan Hukum Oleh Hakim Dalam Persfektif Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika..
Santoso, Topo., & Zulfa, Eva Achajani. (2012). Kriminologi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Soekanto, Soerjono. (1986). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.
Sofyan, Andi., & Azisa, Nur. (2016). Hukum Pidana. Makassar: Pustaka Pena Press.
Sudarto. (1988) Hukum Pidana I, Bahan Penyediaan Bahan-Bahan Kuliah. Semarang: FH UNDIP.
Sudarto.(1986). Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.
Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 (UUD 1945).
