FENOMENA PREDATORY PRICING DALAM PERSAINGAN USAHA DI E COMMERCE (STUDI KASUS ANTARA PENETAPAN TARIF BAWAH ANTARA APLIKASI INDRIVE DAN GOJEK)

  • Alem Savier Savier Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur
  • Teddy Prima Anggriawan Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur
  • Aldira Mara Ditta Caesar Purwanto Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur

Abstract

During the Covid-19 pandemic, people took advantage of financial digitization for transactions so that there was an increase in e-commerce buying and selling transactions in Indonesia. This increase in e-commerce buying and selling transactions also occurred due to the practice of discount parties or massive discounts applied by e-commerce services. This massive discount could be an indication of a form of predatory pricing practice.

References

Anjani, M. R., & Santoso, B. (2018). Urgensi Rekonstruksi Hukum E-Commerce Di Indonesia. Law Reform, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v14i1.20239

Areeda, P., & Turner, D. F. (1975). Predatory pricing and related practices under Section 2 of the Sherman Act. J. Reprints Antitrust L. & Econ., 6, 219.

Bolton, P., Brodley, J. F., & Riordan, M. H. (1999). Predatory pricing: Strategic theory and legal policy. Geo. LJ, 88, 2239.

Fadhilah, M. (2019). Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Oleh Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) Dalam Kerangka Ekstrateritorial. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v3i1.217

Febrina, R. (2017). Dampak Kegiatan Jual Rugi (Predatory Pricing) Yang Dilakukan Pelaku Usaha Dalam Perspektif Persaingan Usaha. Jurnal Selat, 4(2).

Greer, D. F. (1979). A Critique of Areeda and Turner's Standard for Predatory Practices. The Antitrust Bulletin, 24(2), 233-261.

Hanim, L. (2014). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Para Pihak Dalam E-Commerce Sebagai Akibat Dari Globalisasi Ekonomi. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v1i2.1476

Harahap, D. A. (2018). PERILAKU BELANJA ONLINE DI INDONESIA: STUDI KASUS. JRMSI - Jurnal Riset Manajemen Sains Indonesia, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.21009/jrmsi.009.2.02

Harris, T. L. (1997). Integrated marketing public relations. The handbook of strategic public relations and integrated communications, 90-105.

Manda, I. D. G. R., & Indrawati, S. A. A. (2013). Praktik Jual Rugi (Predatory Pricing) Pelaku Usaha Dalam Perspektif Persaingan Usaha.

Saridakis, G., Lai, Y., Mohammed, A.-M., & Hansen, J. M. (2018). Industry characteristics, stages of E-commerce communications, and entrepreneurs and SMEs revenue growth. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 128, 56-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.10.017

Simbolon, A. (2013). Pendekatan Yang Dilakukan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Menentukan Pelanggaran Dalam Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol20.iss2.art2

Susanto, A. (2000). Pengaturan Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia

Syarief, E., Shahrullah, R. S., Jaya, F., & Kurniawan, J. (2021). Potensi Terjadinya Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat pada Penggunaan Aplikasi Perdagangan Elektronik di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Jurnal Supremasi. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v11i1.1290

Wan, X., Yang, D., & Teng, Z. (2022). Blockchain digital technology empowers E-commerce supply chain sustainable value co-creation decisions and coordination considering online consumer reviews. Applied Soft Computing, 130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109662

Zheng, K., Zhang, Z., & Song, B. (2022). Retraction notice to “E-commerce logistics distribution mode in big-data context: A case analysis of JD.COM” [Industrial Marketing Management 86 (2020) 154–162]. Industrial Marketing Management, 106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.08.003

Published
2023-07-21
How to Cite
Savier, A. S., Anggriawan, T., & Purwanto, A. (2023). FENOMENA PREDATORY PRICING DALAM PERSAINGAN USAHA DI E COMMERCE (STUDI KASUS ANTARA PENETAPAN TARIF BAWAH ANTARA APLIKASI INDRIVE DAN GOJEK). Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 9(14), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8170324