Analisa Kasus Jaksa Farizal yang Menerima Suap Dana
Abstract
The rise of corruption cases that occurred became a driving force for the author to conduct research on this case. By using normative juridical writing techniques, namely collecting secondary materials and also literature study. From the results of the research, bribery of funds itself is an act of giving money or receiving money or gifts carried out by government officials to do or not doing something that’s contrary to their obligations, In Indonesia itself, cases of bribery often occur, even though this action violates Law No. 20 of 2001. The case presented by the author with this article is the case of Attorney Farizal receiving a bribe of 440, but Prosecutor Farizal has been sentenced by the court to a fine of 250,000,000 and imprisonment for 5 years. It could be nice for us to be aware of the case bribes around us.
References
Peraturan Jaksa Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor Per–014/A/Ja/11/2012 Tentang Kode Perilaku Jaksa.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 20 Tahun 2008 tentang Tata Cara Pemberhentian Dengan Hormat, Pemberhentian Tidak Dengan Hormat, dan Pemberhentian Sementara, serta Hak Jabatan Fungsional Jaksa Yang Terkena Pemberhentian.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia.
Saputra, A. (2021). Terima Suap 440 Juta, Jaksa Farizal Dibui 5 Tahun. Detik News.
Saputro,O W., & Prasetio, T., & Priyana, P. (2021). Penegakan Kode Etik Terhadap Jaksa Yang Melakukan Korupsi. Jurnal Kertha Semaya. Vol 9( 3).
Zakaria, I. (2017). Jaksa Agung Tegaskan Pecat Farizal Dengan Tidak Hormat, Kompas.
