Analisis Deiksis Sosial Sebagai Representasi Aspek Sosial Dalam Novel Memang Jodoh Karya Marah Rusli
Abstract
This study aims to find out how social deixis represents social aspects in the novel Indeed Jodoh by Marah Rusli by using social deixis theory from Levinson (1983) and supported by the results of Stockwell's research (2020) regarding elements of social deixis to produce broader social aspects. This type of research is descriptive qualitative with the sociology of literature method which examines the relationship of literature with social aspects. Therefore, the social aspects used refer to aspects of the sociology of literature put forward by Löwenthal, namely social class, love, work, religion, nature, and art. Deictic expressions that represent social aspects are collected, then classified, and analyzed. The total social deictic expressions found were 232: 68 aspects of social class, 65 aspects of love, 35 aspects of religion, 27 each of work and nature aspects, and 10 aspects of art. The high number of aspects of social class and love shows that this novel raises the issue of social class and class conflict which is illustrated by resistance to arranged marriage culture. The research results also show that social deixis can help readers better understand the essence of a literary work.
References
Abdulameer, T. A. S. A. (2019). A Pragmatic Analysis of Deixis in a Religious Text. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(2), 292. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n2p292
Alwaqaa, M, A. (2020). Sociology and Literature: An Interdisciplinary Approach Journal of Liberal Arts and Humanities (JLAH), 1(10), 34–38.
Brooks, H., Bee, P., & Rogers, A. (2019). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z.
Chapman, G, D. (2010). The 5 Love Languages: The Secret of Love That Lasts. Chicago: Northfield Publishing.
Damono, S, D. (1978). Sosiologi Sastra: Sebuah Pengantar Ringkas. Jakarta: Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa.
Endraswara, S. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Sosiologi Sastra. Jakarta: PT Buku Seru.
Gheni, A, A. (2019). A Study of Deictic Shift Theory as a Stylistic Approach in the Analysis of Point of View Effects in Fictional Discourse. Al-Ustath Journal for Human and Social Sciences, 58(2), 129-142.
Grundy, P. (2008). Doing Pragmatics. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
Hamilton, A. B., & Finley, E. P. (2019). Qualitative methods in implementation research: An introduction. Psychiatry Research, 280(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112516.
Kubra, K., Murtza, A., & Mahmood, M. (2018). Deixis Role as an Index of Style: A Comparative Corpus Stylistics Analysis of Self, Pakistani and Other Translators. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(5), 87. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v8n5p87.
Levinson, S, C. (1983). Pragmatics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Laurenson, D, T., & Swingewood, A. (1972). The Sociology of Literature. New York: Shocken Books.
Mulyati. (2019). Deiksis Sosial Dalam Kumpulan Cerpen Lembah Kehidupan Karya M. Husseyn Umar (Kajian Pragmatik). Jurnal Bindo Sastra, 3(2), 75–82.
Nurmala, R, T., Suherman, A. (2021). Aspek Sosial dalam Kumpulan Cerita Pendek Layung Karya Aam Amilia. LOKABASA 12(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.17509/jlb.v12i2.
Oxford Reference. Overview Leo Löwenthal. https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100116815 diakses pada tanggal 10 April 2021.
Rusli, M. (2013). Memang Jodoh. Bandung: PT Mizan Pustaka.
Segal, E, M. (2009). Narative Comprehension and The Role of Deictic Shift Theory. In Duchan F, J., Bruder, G, A., Hewitt, L, E, (1st Edition), Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective (pp. 3-18). New York: Routledge.
Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. New York: Routledge.
Stockwell, P. (2020). Literary dialect as social deixis. Language and Literature, 29(4), 358–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947020968661.
Sulaiman, Z. (2017). Telaah Bacan Liar Dalam Sejarah Sastra Indonesia. CARAKA: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia & Bahasa Daerah STKIP Garut, 6(2), 22–40.
Váňa, J. (2020). Theorizing the Social Through Literary Fiction: For a New Sociology of Literature. Cultural Sociology, 14(2), 180–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975520922469.
Windhasari, F., Ratsansari, I. (2019). Aspek Sosial dan Nilai Sosiologis yang Terdapat pada Cerpen Matsuri No Ban Karya Kenji Miyazawa. Jurnal Ayumi, 6(1), 71–86.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. New York: University Press.
