Jurnal Pengalaman Komunikasi Mahasiswa Generasi Sandwich (Stusi Fenomenologi Pada Mahasiswa Di Kabupaten Karawang)
Abstract
This research uses qualitative methods and a phenomenological approach, because in this study we want to find out a phenomenon that comes from the direct experience of the informants, and also want to know its meaning and motives. The theory used in this study is Alfred Schutz's Phenomenological Theory which is the basis for researchers in carrying out this research.
The results of the study show that first, the motives for students choosing to be the sandwich generation are due to economic factors and family factors. Then the motive for (in-order-to motive) is to increase income, fill time, family demands, and achieve desires. Second, interpreting sandwich generation students as paying tuition fees and helping parents, experience and special roles, family demands, and career support. Third, communication experiences are divided into two categories, namely positive communication experiences such as good treatment from family, and support from friends. While the negative communication experience gained is not supported by family and belittled by friends.
References
Anonim. (2020, Juli 28). KENALI GENERASI SANDWICH, APAKAH KAMU SALAH SATUNYA? pp. https://www.jaringanprima.co.id/id/kenali-generasi-sandwich-apakah-kamu-salah-satunya.
Eko A. Meinarno, S. K. (2010). Keluarga Indonesia : aspek dan dinamika zaman. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.
Genta Mahardhika Rozalinna, V. L. (2021). Rusunawa dan Sandwich Generation: Resiliensi Masa Pandemi di Ruang Perkotaan. Brawijaya Journal of Social Science , https://bjss.ub.ac.id/index.php/bjss/article/view/11.
Hadi Purwanto, N. S. (2013). Perbedaan hasil belajar mahasiswa yang bekerja dengan tidak bekerja program studi pendidikan teknik bangunan jurusan teknik sipil ft-unp.
Hartaji, R. D. (2012). Motivasi Berprestasi Pada Mahasiswa yang Berkuliah Dengan Jurusan Pilihan Orangtua. http://docplayer.info/34427591-Motivasi-berprestasi-pada-mahasiswa-yang-berkuliah-dengan-jurusan-pilihan-orang-tua.html.
Herdiyan Maulana, P. O. (2018). Indonesian Perspective of Wellbeing: A Qualitative Study. The Qualitative Report, https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol23/iss12/18.
Kuswarno, E. (2005). Tradisi Fenomenologi pada Penelitian Komunikasi Kualitatif . DIKTI.
Lexy J. Moleong, M. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif [Edisi Revisi]. Remaja Rosdakarya.
LN, S. Y. (2012). Psikologi Perkembangan Anak dan Remaja. . Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Marszila. (2020, September 19). Himpunan Mahasiswa Planologi ITS. Retrieved from https://hima.pwk.its.ac.id/new-sandwich-generation-bertahan-dalam-masa-pandemi/
Miles, M. B. (1992). Analisis data kualitatif. JAKARTA: UI PRESS.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods . Sage .
Mulyana, D. (2003). Teori Paradigma . Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Omeoo. (2013, November 26). Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Retrieved from P2PTM: http://p2ptm.kemkes.go.id/kegiatan-p2ptm/aceh/populasi-lansia-diperkirakan-terus-meningkat-hingga-tahun-2020
Purwanto, H. (2013). PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR MAHASISWA YANG BEKERJA DENGAN TIDAK BEKERJA PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN TEKNIK BANGUNAN JURUSAN TEKNIK SIPIL FT-UNP. Journal Of CIVED.
Rorong, M. J. (2020). Fenomenologi . Cv Budi Utama .
RR. Ponco Dewi Karyaningsih, M. (2018). Ilmu Komunikasi . Penerbit Samudra Biru (Anggota IKAPI).
Siswoyo, D. (1995). Ilmu Pendidikan . Penerbit Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Institut Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta.
Sudikin, B. d. (2002). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Perspektif Mikro. Surabaya: Insan Cendekia.
Sugiyono, P. D. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Tjipto Subadi, M. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Surakarta.
Wild, J. (1967). The Phenomenology of the Social World. Northon University Press.
Yusuf, S. (2012). Psikologi Perkembangan Anak dan Remaja. . Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
