Pencemaran Nama Baik Melalui Media Sosial Berdasarkan Putusan Nomor 26/PID.SUS/2022/PT SBY
Abstract
Defamation through technological sophistication in the form of software, or better known as defamation through social media. This crime can also be included in cybercrime, it is regulated in article 27 paragraph (3) of Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning information and electronic transactions and in the Criminal Code. In determining the decision related to defamation through social media, it must meet the elements in a defamation case on social media. So that the judge in deciding case number 26 / PID. SUS/2022/PT SBY must meet these elements.
The research was carried out using a normative juridical approach and the specifications were carried out using a descriptive analysis. Sources and types of data used are primary data, secondary data and tertiary data. Data collection techniques using interview techniques and literature study, and the data obtained will be analyzed descriptively qualitatively.
The results of the study can be concluded that Indonesian legal arrangements regarding online shop fraud crimes can be seen in Article 378 of the Criminal Code and Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions which in its implementation the ITE Law does not yet contain articles that specifically act criminal defamation, Article 27 (3) of the ITE Law which focuses on the act of spreading false and misleading news that harms people or institutions. Because this criminal act of defamation is a cyber crime, the proof must use electronic evidence or electronic documents or printouts based on the provisions of Article 5 of the ITE Law.
References
Adami Chazawi. (2013). Hukum Pidana Positif Penghinaan, Banyumedia Publishing, Malang.
Barda Nawawi arif. (2017). Tujuan Dan Pedoman Pemidanaan (Perspektif Pembaharuan Dan Perbandingan Hukum Pidana), Pustaka Magister, Semarang.
Delik Penghinaan - NegaraHukum.com
Dudik Djaja Sidarta, Subekti. 2020. Penyelesaian Kejahatan Terhadap Kemanusiaan Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia View of PENYELESAIAN KEJAHATAN TERHADAP KEMANUSIAAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA (unigres.ac.id)
Eddy O.S. Hiariej. (2012). Teori dan Hukum Pembuktian, Erlangga, Jakarta.
Eko Pamuji. (2020) Ujaran Kebencian pada ruang – ruang digital, Jurnal Kajian Merdia http://repository.unitomo.ac.id/2943/1/Ujaran%20kebencian%20pada%20ruang%20%E2%80%93%20ruang%20digital.pdf
Hari Sasangka dan Lily Rosita. (2003). Hukum Pembuktian dalam Perkara Pidana, Bandung, Mandar Maju, Bandung.
Indonesia, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Atas UU No. 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. LN. No.251 Tahun 2016.
Laden Marpaung. (2011). Proses Penanganan Perkara Pidana (Di Kejaksaan dan Pengadilan Negeri Upaya Hukum dan Eksekusi), Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Moeljanto. (2007). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.
P.A.F. Lamintang. (1990). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Sinar Baru, Bandung.
Raharjo, A. (2002). Cyber Crime Pemahaman Dan Upaya Pencegahan Kejahatan Berteknologi, PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Ratna Wati. (2020). Tentang Pemidanaan Dan Pembinaan Narapidana Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan laporan penelitian ratna baru.docx (live.com)
Rukmini, M. (2009). Aspek Hukum Pidana Dan Kriminologi, P.T Alumni, Bandung.
Setiyono. (2005). Kejahatan Korporasi, Bayumedia Publishing, Malang.
Siswanto Sunarso. (2009). Hukum Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (Studi Kasus: Prita Mulyasari). Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
Undang-Undang Nomor. Tahun 1946 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana
