Etika Pemerintahan sebagai Katalis Diskresi dalam Penanganan Covid-19 Menurut Undang-Undang No. 2 Tahun 2020
Abstract
Implementation of public policy is a very basic demand for modern government. Where every citizen has the right to get good service for goods, services and administrative services provided by the government. The management of relations between the center and the regions has become “fuzzy and unclear”, when Indonesia faces a situation known as a Public Health Emergency. This health emergency arises because of the spread of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) which is spread throughout Indonesia. In addition, when the central government has not determined policies, local governments are required to exercise discretion to decide prevention policies. There are various forms of prevention. There are regions that have taken a policy of closing access in and out of the city for four months, confirming the area as an Extraordinary Event (KLB), and closing flight routes and sea routes. However, this discretionary step that is often taken is sometimes wrong, as if it is not directed. This research uses normative legal research by using literature study. The secondary data collected in this study were re-examined to determine the completeness of the data obtained, their clarity and relevance to the formulation.
References
Bugin, Burhan. (2001). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial. Surabaya: Airlangga Universitas Press.
Admosudiharjo, P. (1987). Manajemen Sumber daya Manusia. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Admosudiharjo, P. (1994). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Bhakti, Teguh S. (2014). Bunga Rampai Peradilan Administrasi Kontemporer, Yogyakarta: Genta Press.
Clement Fatovic. (2015). Outside the Law : Executive and Emergency Power. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Danim, Sudarwan. (2004). Motivasi Kepemimpinan dan Efektivitas Kelompok. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Darumurti, Krishna D. (2012). Kekuasaan Diskresi Pemerintah. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Faal, M. (1991). Diskresi Kepolisian. Jakarta: PT. Pradnya Paramita.
Handayaningrat, Soewarno. (1985). Sistem Birokrasi Pemerintah. Jakarta: CV Mas Agung.
H.R, Ridwan. (2016). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Kurniawan, Agung. (2005). Transformasi Pelayanan Publik. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Pembaharuan.
Mahmudi. (2005). Manajemen Kinerja sektor public. Yogyakarta: UPP AMP YKPN.
Moenir, H.A.S. (2006). Manajemen Pelayanan Umum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Nazarudin, Letje. (1994). Evaluasi Kinerja Perusahaan, Yogyakarta.
Ndraha, Taliziduhu. (2015). Kybernology: Ilmu Pemerintahan Baru, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
R.B, Gibson. (1981). The Value of Participation, dalam p.s. Elder, Environmental Management and Public Participation. Toronto: Canadian Environmental Law Association.
Steers, Richard M. (1985). Efektivitas Organisasi. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Spelt, N.M. & J.B.J.M, (1992). Pemerintahan menurut hukum (Wet-en Rechtmatig Bestuur), Surabaya: Yuridika.
Syamsi, Ibnu. (1988). Pokok-Pokok Organisasi dan Manajemen Umum. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.
Panjaitan, Saut P. (2017). Makna dan Peranan Freies Ermessen dalam Hukum Administrasi, Negara. dalam S.F. Marbun , et.al. Eds. Op.cit.
World Bank. (2000). Anticorruption in Transition: A Contribution to the Policy Debate. Washington DC: World Bank.
Zahnd, Markus. (2006). Perancangan Kota Secara Terpadu.
