The Validity of Jigsaw Cooperative Learning Model Learning Devices on Biodiversity Material

Herinda Mardin

doi:10.5281/zenodo.8105664

Herinda Mardin Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8105664

Keywords: Lesson Plans, Cooperative Learning, Jigsaw

Abstract

The effectiveness and achievement of learning objectives is determined by the teacher. The teacher must design the lesson plans before the learning activities take place. This study aims to develop lesson plans based on the JigSaw type cooperative learning model for quality biodiversity materials based on the level of validity. The research only focuses on testing the validity of learning devices. The final result of this research is to produce a valid lesson plan learning device product. To determine the level of validity of this research tool through the expert validation stages (expert learning tools). This expert test (validation) is carried out by 4 validators who are lecturers and experts in the field of education, there are 8 aspects that are assessed in the lesson plan. The results showed that the level of validity of the lesson plan with the cooperative learning jigsaw model from expert validation was quite valid with an average value of 3.2.

References

Abdullah, (2013). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Science Berorientasi Cultural Deviance Solution Berbasis Inkuiri. Jurnal Index, 88

Afriyanti, I., Wardono, dan Kartono. 2018. Pengembangan Literasi Matematika Mengacu PISA Melalui Pembelajaran Abad Ke-21 Berbasis Teknologi. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika. Vol 1: 608-617.

Asmani, J. M. M. (2016). Tips Efektif Cooperative Learning: Pembelajaran Aktif, Kreatif, dan Tidak Membosankan. Diva Press.

Depdiknas. 2008. Panduan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Atas Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Hakim, L. (2009). Perencanaan Pembelajaran. Bandung: CV Wacana Prima. 2009.

Hamalik, O. (2014). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Hayati, S. (2016). Belajar dan Pembelajaran Kooperatif Learning. Magelang: Graha Cendekia.

Jaya, F. (2019). Perencanaan Pembelajaran, Medan: UINSU.

Kurniasih, I., & Sani, B. (2016). Ragam Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran. Surkarta: Kata Pena.

Kusuma, N., Mujib, A., Syahputra, E., & Ariswoyo, S. (2020). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Talk Write Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 4(2), 39-45.

Lubis, M. A., Harahap, T., & Nasution, D. P. (2021). Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Nht Dalam Membelajarkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa: Analisis Validitas Perangkat Pembelajaran. JURNAL MathEdu (Mathematic Education Journal), 4(2), 216-223.

Mansur, S., & Mole, P. N. (2021). Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD Untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar Siswa dengan Materi Ekositem Kelas X SMA. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 7(5), 355-365.

Setyorini, N. A., Pranoto, B. A., & Triputra, D. R. (2022). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Nht Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Keaktifan Peserta Didik. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 8(16), 426-437.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan : Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suharsaputra, U. (2014). Metode Penelitian : Kuantitatif, Kualitaif, dan Tindakan. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.