Analisis perilaku Phubbing dan faktor penyebabnya
Abstract
Generation Z is currently under threat from the negative impact of technological developments in the form of Phubbing Behavior, therefore the Phubbing phenomenon must immediately receive serious attention and look for what factors cause the Phubbing behavior, this is important to do because the Phubbing Phenomenon has we can see it anywhere, especially in the school environment. The purpose of this study was to determine the level of students' Phubbing Behavior and its causal factors based on gender and grade level. This research uses a type of quantitative descriptive research. the number of respondents in this study totaled 173 male and female students with grade levels 10, 11 and 12. The data collection was carried out through the Phubbing Behavior scale based on the theory and aspects described by Karadag and using the Generic Scale of Phubbing (GSP) scale developed by Chotpitayasunondh and Douglas. A descriptive analysis was then carried out. The results obtained from this study are that the level of Phubbing behavior of students at SMK Bina Profesi Pekanbaru is in the moderate category, then the factors that cause Phubbing behavior in male students are the Nomophobia factor while in female students are the interpersonal conflict factors and the factors that cause Phubbing behavior. based on class level, namely the Interpersonal Conflict factor in grades 10 and 11, and the Nomophobia factor in grade 12. The results of this study can help guidance and counseling teachers in providing treatment to students both in the form of Guidance and Counseling
References
Alamudi, Farida Syafira Nadjib Ahmad.(2019). Sosial Phubbing Di Kalangan Mahasiswa Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Negeri Makassar (Tesis, Universitas Negeri Makassar).
APJII.(2018) Bulletin APJII : Survei APJII : Penetrasi di Indonesia Capai 143 Juta Jiwa, Tresnakusuma (Ed) Diakses 5 Desember 2022 dari https://apjii.or.id/content/read/104/348 /BULETIN-APJII-EDISI-22---Maret-2018.
Arifin Nur B. 2020. Phubbing & Komunikasi Sosial. Jember, Jawa Timur : UIJ-KYAI MOJO.
Azwar, S. (2012). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi (2nd ed.). Pustaka Belajar.
Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2016). How “Phubbing” Becomes The Norm: The Antecedents And Consequences Of Snubbing Via Smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior 6(3): 9–18.
Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). Measuring phone snubbing behavior: Development and validation of the Generic Scale of Phubbing (GSP) and the Generic Scale of Being Phubbed (GSBP). Computers in Human Behavior 8(8): 5–17.
Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). The effect of “Phubbing” on social interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 48(6): 304-316.
Duggan, M. & Brenner, J. (2013). The demographics of social media users. Pew Research Center. Diunduh dari https:// www.pewresearch.org/internet /2013 / 02/14/the-demographics-of-social-media-users-2012/.
Elizabeth B. Hurlock. 1980. Psikologi Perkembangan. Jakarta: Erlangga
Fajar,B., Budi.P.,Tamsil.M.,&Retno. L., (2013). Hubungan Antara Persepsi Dengan Cara Penyelesaian Konflik Interpersonal Pada Siswa Kelas Xi Jurusan Akuntansi Smk Mahardhika Surabaya, Jurnal BK UNESA. Volume 03 Nomor 01. 136-143.
Fajri (2017) Fajri, Fitri Verawati and Lisnawati Ruhaena. (2017). Hubungan Antara Penggunaan Telepon Genggam Smartphone Dengan Nomophobia Pada Mahasiswa. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/ 56457
Farida Syafira Nadjib Ahmad Alamudi.(2019).Sosial Phubbing Di Kalangan Mahasiswa Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Negeri Makassar.6(3):31-36
Fika Hilmi Izzati, 2019., Pengaruh Perilaku Phubbing Terhadap Interaksi Sosial Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri 8 Di Pekanbaru.Skripsi. Pekanbaru : Universitas Islam Riau.
Haigh, N. (2012). Stop Phubbing. Diakses pada 20 Juni 2022 dari stopPhubbing.com.
Hanika.(2015). Fenomena Phubbing Di Era Milenia (Ketergantungan Seseorang pada Smartphone terhadap Lingkungannya)," Interaksi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi 4(1): 42-51.
Karadag, E., Tosuntas, S.B., Erzen, E., Duru, P., Bostan, N., S ̧ ahin, B. M., Babadag, B. (2015). Determinants of Phubbing, which is thesum of many virtual addictions:a structural equation model. Journal of Behavioral Addictions 4(2): 60-74.
Krasnova, H.,Olga, A., Isabelle, N., & Annika,B. (2016).Why Phubbing Is Toxic For Your Relationsip: Undersyanding The Role Of Smartphone Jealousy Among “Generation Y” Users. Twenty-Fourth European Conference On Informasion Systems (ECIS),Istanbul,Turkey.
Kurniawan dkk. (2013) Karuniawan, A., & Ika, Y.C. (2013). Hubungan antara Academic Stress dengan Smartphone Addiction pada Mahasiswa Pengguna Smartphone, Jurnal Psikologi Klinis dan Kesehatan Mental, 2(1), 16-21.
Mail Online (2008). Nomophobia is the fear of being out of mobile phone contact – and it’s the plague of our 24/7 age. Diunduh dari: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-550610/Nomophobia-fear-mobile-phonecontact—plague-24-7-age.html
Moulin, K. and Chung, C. (2017). ‘Technology Trumping Sleep: Impact Of Electronic Media and Sleep In Late Adolescent Students’. Jounal of Education and Learning, 6(1),pp.294-321.
Park, N. & Lee, H. (2014a). Nature of youth adiksi smartphone in Korea. Media Information Resarch, 51(1), 100-132.
Park, N. & Lee, H. (2014b). Gender difference in social networking on smartphones: a case study of korean college student smartphone users. International Telecommunications Policy Review, 21(2). 1-18
Pavithra et al.,(2015) Pavithra., Madhukumar, S., & Murthy, M. (2015). A study on Nomophobiamobile phone dependence, among student of a medical college in Bangalore. National Journal of Community Medicine, 6, 340-344.
Putri Amelia Pratiwi. (2021). Gambaran Perilaku Phubbing Pada Generasi Z, Jurnal Socio Humanus 3(3): 272-281.
Roberts JA, David ME. (2016).My Life has become a Major Distraction from My Cell Phone: Partner Phubbing and Relationship Satisfaction among Romantic Partners. Comput Hum Behav. 54: 134-41
Sabra (2014) Sabra, R. F. (2014). Studi deskriptif mengenai stress appraisal dan coping stress terhadap tuntutan akademik pada siswa sma x di bandung. Pustaka Ilmiah Universitas Padjajaran, 1–7.
Singarimbun, M., & Effendi, S. (1989). Metode Penelitian Survai. Lembaga Penelitian, Pendidikan, Penerangan Ekonomi dan Sosial (LP3ES).
Soraya, F. (2020). Pengaruh Penyesuaian Diri, Prokrastinasi Akademik, Dukungan Sosial, dan Faktor Demografi terhadap Stres Akademik pada Mahasiswa UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. Bachelor’s Thesis, Fakultas Psikologi UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Sugiyono.(2019). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Kuantitatif,Kualitatif, Kombinasi,R&D dan Penelitian Pendidikan).Bandung: ALFABETA CV.
Elni Yakub, M Arli Rusandi, Tri Umari. (2019). Phubbing as a Result of the 4th Industrial Revolution: Is it Dangerous?. Proceedings of the UR International Conference on Educational Sciences, 230-236.
Turner, A. (2015). Generation Z: Technology and Social Interest. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 71(2), 103–113.https://doi.org/10.1353/jip. 2015.0021
Wardana dan Dinata (2016) Wardana,M.S., Dinata, I.M.K (2016). Tingkat stres siswa menjelang ujian akhir semester di SMAN 4 Denpasar. E-Jurnal Medika, Vol. 5 No.9, September, 2016.
Wibowo, A., & Cholifah, T. N. (2019). Bahan Ajar Instrumen Tes Tematik Terpadu. Media Nusa Creative (MNC Publishing). https://www.google.co.id/books/edition/ Instrumen_Tes_Tematik_Terpadu/zsVGEAAAQBAJ?h1=id&gbpv=0
Wiwin, Heris & Devy (2021). Gambaran Penyesuaian Diri Siswa Kelas X Ipa 3 Sma Negeri 25 Garut,4(1).Fokus,32-38.
Youarti, I. E., & Hidayah, N. (2018). Perilaku Phubbing Sebagai Karakter Remaja Generasi Z. Jurnal Fokus Konseling, 4 (1), 143-152.https://doi.org/10.26638/jfk.553.2099
