THE EFFECT OF STUDENTS SELF-EFFICACY LEVEL IN USING TECHNOLOGY ON PRE-SERVICE TEACHER TEACHING PERFORMANCE
Abstract
The widespread use of technology across all parts of life is finally forcing educators to integrate current technology into the classroom environment in response to the growing needs of millennial learners. One of the efforts to integrate technology into the classroom is through pre-service teachers' self-efficacy when using technology. Self-efficacy is the ability of a teacher to have the confidence to influence students in learning to achieve learning targets; in this study, especially using technological knowledge.
This study gathered data on preservice teachers’ self-efficacy in using technology through questionnaire survey and observation. The partial least squares (PLS) of the structure equation modelling (SEM) technique used to analyze the data. This study involved students from PBI Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta batch 2019 and 2020. The research was conducted by non-random sampling. This study uses quantitative methods of research. According to Creswell (1994), quantitative research explains phenomena by collecting numerical data analyzed using mathematically based methods (in particular, statistics). This study aimed to find out how preservice teachers' self-efficacy level regarding the use of technology in microteaching classes and the effect of students’ self-efficacy level in using technology on pre-service teachers' teaching performance.
This study’s results show an effect between preservice teachers’ self-efficacy (X) on preservice teachers’ teaching performance. It can be seen from the parameter coefficient value is 0.334, meaning that for every one-unit increase in Self Efficacy, Teaching Performance will increase by 0.334 units. This study concluded that the research data was analyzed using the Partial-Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. It concluded that there was a significant effect between the preservice teachers’ self-efficacy in using technology on pre-service teachers' teaching performance.
References
Absari, Nalurita, Priyanto Priyanto, & Muslikhin Muslikhin. "The Effectiveness of
Technology, Pedagogy and Content Knowledge (TPACK) in Learning."
Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan [Online], 26.1 (2020): 43-51.
Web. 15 May. 2023
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and
functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral
change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Bakac, E. (2018). The impact on technology integration self-efficacy beliefs of
prospective teachers’ self-directed learning trends with technology.
European Journal of Education Studies, 4(12), 72-86. doi:
5281/zenodo.1341050
Amalia, F. R., & Widhiatama, D. A. / Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan 9(24), 311-326
- 325 -
Caner, M. & Aydın, S. (2021). SELF EFFICACY BELIEFS OF PRE-SERVICE
TEACHERS ON TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION . Turkish Online
Journal of Distance Education , 22 (3), 79-94 . DOI: 10.17718/tojde.961820
Chukwuemeka, E. J., Nsofor, C. C., Falode, O. C. & Aniah A. (2019). Assessing
pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge self-
efficacy towards technology integration in Colleges of Education in South-
west Nigeria. Journal of Science, Technology, Mathematics and Education,
(3), 143-151.
Corry, Michael & Stella, Julie. (2018). Teacher self-efficacy in online education: A
review of the literature. Research in Learning Technology. 26.
25304/rlt.v26.2047.
Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches.
Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed
Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2012). Educational research:
competencies for analysis and applications. 10th ed. Boston, Pearson.
Hair, Joe & Sarstedt, Marko & Hopkins, Lucas & Kuppelwieser, Volker. (2014).
Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM): An
Emerging Tool for Business Research. European Business Review. 26. 106-
10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128.
Joseph F. Hair, G. Tomas M.Hult, Christian M.Ringle, M. S., 2014. Partial Least
Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Edited by Vicki
Knight. United States of America: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Kabir, Syed Muhammad. (2016). METHODS OF DATA COLLECTION.
Khasanah, U. "Pengantar Microteaching.", 2020, books.google.com,
https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=RQzyDwAAQBAJ&oi=f
nd&pg=PP1&dq=microteaching&ots=n8s4GxjY5y&sig=npnEepi2WT9U
M6r6bxCemQqT3MM
Kelley, K., Clark, B., Brown, V., & Sitzia, J. (2003). Good Practice in the Conduct
and Reporting of Survey Research. International Journal or Quality in
Health Care, 15, 261-266.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzg031
Kent, A.M., & Giles, R.M. (2017). Preservice Teachers' Technology Self-
Efficacy. SRATE Journal, 26, 9-20.
Mishra, Punya and Matthew J. Koehler. “Technological Pedagogical Content
Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge.” Teachers College
Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education 108 (2006): 1017 - 1054.
Moore-Hayes, Coleen. (2011). Technology Integration Preparedness and its
Influence on Teacher-Efficacy. Canadian Journal of Learning and
Technology / La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie.
10.21432/T2B597.
Omar, Mohd Norakmar & Noor, Siti. (2021). Empowering Teacher Self-Efficacy
On ICT: How Does Technology Leadership Play A Role?. 9. 1-22.
P. Mishra and M. J. Koehler, “Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A
Framework for Teacher Knowledge,” Teach. Coll. Rec., vol. 108, no. 6, pp.
–1054, 2006.
Amalia, F. R., & Widhiatama, D. A. / Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan 9(24), 311-326
- 326 -
Rabaa'i, Ahmad. (2018). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to
assess Students' Behavioural Intentions to adopt an e-Learning System: The
Case of Moodle as a Learning Tool.
Rahmadi, Fitri Rahmadi. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge
(TPACK): Kerangka Pengetahuan Guru Abad 21
http://dx.doi.org/10.32493/jpkn.v6i1.y2019.p65-74
Research in Learning Technology 2018. © 2018 M. Corry and J. Stella. Research
in Learning Technology is the journal of the Association for Learning
Technology (ALT), a UK-based professional and scholarly society and
membership organization. 26: 2047 http://dx.doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.2047
Roger D. Goddard, Wayne K. Hoy, and Anita Woolfolk Hoy Volume 37, Issue 2
https://doi.org/10.3102/000283120370024
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D.
Bandung: CV.
Alfabeta.
Shukla, Satishprakash. (2020). CONCEPT OF POPULATION AND SAMPLE.
Tschannen-Moran, Megan & Hoy, Anita & Hoy, Wayne. (1998). Teacher Efficacy:
Its Meaning and Measure. Review of Educational Research - REV EDUC
RES. 68. 202-248. 10.3102/00346543068002202.
Wufron, Wufron. (2020). Analisis Regresi Linier dengan IBM SPSS Statistics.
31219/osf.io/fwex8.
Wong, Ken. (2013). Partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)
techniques using SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin. 24. 1-32.
Yellapu, Vikas. (2018). Descriptive statistics. International Journal of Academic
Medicine. 4. 60. 10.4103/IJAM.IJAM_7_
