Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Model Project Based Learning (PJBL) Terintegrasi Stem Dalam Meningkatkan Kreativitas IPA Peserta Didik
Abstract
This development research is motivated by the lack of ability and creativity of students in the learning process. This is caused by the choice of learning methods that are only teacher-centred. The aim of this research is to create a STEM-based PjBL model learning tool that can increase students' creativity that is valid, effective and practical. Syllabus, learning implementation plans (RPP), student worksheets (LKPD), and creativity test instruments are some of the products developed in research and development (R&D) which are included in the Borg & Gall model. The research instrument consists of a validation sheet, practicality sheet, and creativity test sheet. The validity of the learning tools was carried out using a validation questionnaire which was assessed by 4 validators, consisting of two lecturers, one principal and one class teacher, who were then evaluated using a Likert scale. The results of the pretest and posttest with the N-Gain test are used to find out how effective the STEM-based PjBL model learning tools are. The practicality of learning tools through questionnaires used by teachers and students. The results of the validity analysis of learning tools using a Likert scale show that 92% of the syllabus is in the very feasible category, 90% of the RPP, 88% of the LKPD, and 93% of the test instruments are in the category very worthy. By using the average NGain test results of 0.40 and the medium category, creativity increases. The results of the questionnaire analysis of teacher and student responses to the PJBL-STEM learning model showed practicality of 4.00 (very good) and implementation of activities of 3.92 (very good) and 3.00 (good). Thus, it can be concluded that the STEM-based PjBL model learning tools were developed correctly, efficiently, and can be applied to increase student creativity.
References
Afriana, J., Permanasari, A., & Fitriani, A. (2016). Penerapan Project Based Learning Terintegrasi STEM untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Siswa Ditinjau dari Gender. Jurnal Inovasi Guruan IPA, 2(2), 202– 212. http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v2i2.8561
Fatmawati, A. (2016). Pengembangat Perangkat Pembelajaran Konsep Pencemaran
Lingkungan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Berdasarkan Masalah. Jurnal Edusains Vol 4 No.2
Hall, A., & Miro, D. (2014). A Study of Student Engagement in Project-Based
Learning Across Multiple Approaches to STEM Education Programs. School
Science and Mathematics, 116(6), 310–319.
Han, S., Rosli, R., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2016). The Effect of Science,
Technology , Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Project Based Learning
(PBL) on Students ’ Achievement in Four Mathematics Topics. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(Special Issue), 3–29.
Kristanti, Y. D., Subiki, & Handayani, R. D. (2016). Model Pembelajaran Berbasis
Proyek (Project Based Learning Model) Pada Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 5(2), 122–128.
Mawarni, R., & Sani, R. A. (2020). Pengaruh Model Project Based Learning Berbasis STEM Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Pada Materi Pokok Fluida Statis Tinggi T.P 2019/2020. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Fisika 8(2), 8-15.
Nugroho, O. F., Permanasari, A., & Firman, H. (2019). The Movement Of STEM Education In Indonesia: Science Teachers ’ Perspectives. Jurnal Guruan IPA Indonesia, 8(3), 417 425.https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i3.192 52
Sudaryono, S. (2016). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.
Sugiyono, S. (2017). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: alfabeta.
Winarni, J., Zubaidah, S., & Koes, S. (2016). STEM: Apa, Mengapa, Bagaimana. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA Pascasarjana UM, Vol.1, 976-984


