Politik Hukum Pengaturan Plea Bargaining Dalam Penegakan Hukum Perkara Pidana Di Indonesia
Abstrak
In Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power, it is stated that justice must be based on simplicity, speed and low costs. However, in reality the process of trying in court in Indonesia is very inversely proportional, considering the large number of cases that have to be resolved at a very high cost, very long queues and the buildup of cases in Indonesian courts which is increasing. This research will understand the concept of plea bargaining which will be added to the criminal justice system in Indonesia. This type of research can be classified as normative juridical research, because this research is carried out by examining secondary data and approaches to law. This normative research examines the applicable regulations and links them with legal politics in the formation of rules to achieve the ideal concept in implementation of Plea Bargainig. The results of this research examine and analyze the rules relating to plea bargaining in the United States and several other countries to obtain the urgency and ideal concept for implementing plea bargaining in Indonesia. The fundamental element for the author to research is Law Number 48 of 2009 Article 2 paragraph (4) concerning judicial power considering that this law contains the principles of justice which is carried out quickly, simply and at low cost. So this is very much in conflict with the reality that exists in the court process in Indonesia.
Referensi
Buku
Atmasasmita,Romli. 2010. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kontemporer, Kencana Prenada Media Grup, Jakarta.
B. Garner, Bryan. 2010. Black’s Law Dictionary, West Publishing Company
Hakim, Lukman, Ika Dewi Sartika Saimima, Anggreany Haryani Putri, 2020, Penerapan Konsep “Plea Bargaining” (Dalam Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (RKUHAP) Dan Manfaatnya Bagi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia,Deepublish, Yogyakarta.
Joko, Sriwidodo, 2020, Perkembangan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia, Kepel Press, Yogyakarta.
Mutiara Febby Nelson, 2020, Plea Bargaining & Deffered Prosection Agreement, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta Timur.
R. Sugiharto, 2012, Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Dan Sekilas Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Beberapa Negara, Unissula Press , Semarang.
Ramadhan, Choky Risda, 2015, “Jalur Khusus” dan Plea Bargaining: Serupa Tapi Tidak Sama, Jakarta.
Sarah Breslow, 2013, Pleading Guilty to Death: Protecting the Capital Defendant's Sixth Amendment Right to A Jury Sentencing After Entering A Guilty Plea, Jurnal Intenasional. 98 Cornell L. Rev.
Soemardi, Dedi. 2012, Pengantar Hukum Indonesia, Indhillco, Jakarta.
Soekanto, Soerjono dan Sri Mamudji, 2010, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, PT. Rajagrafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Suryawati, Nany, 2020, Hak Asasi Politik Perempuan, Ideas Publishing, Gorontalo.
Jurnal, Karya Ilmiah
Aby Mulana, Konsep Pengakuan Bersalah Terdakwa Pada “Jalur Khusus” Menurut RUU KUHAP Dan Perbandingannya Dengan Praktek Plea Bargaining Di Beberapa Negara, Jurnal Hukum, diakses dari journal.uinjkt.ac.id, pada 20 september 2022.
Kukuh Dwi Kurniawan, Dwi Ratna Indri Hapsari, Izza Enggar Prasetya, Pemberlakuan Plea Bargaining System Sebagai Alternaitif Upaya Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Untuk Tujuan Menyelesaikan Konflik, Jurnal JURISPRUDENCE, 10(2), 193.
Ladito R. Bagaskoro,2021, Rekonseptualisasi Jalur Khusus Dalam Rancangan KUHAP Sebagai Bentuk Reformasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia, Jurnal HUKUM, 14 (10), 199-200.
Lukman Hakim dan Sonny Zulhuda, 2020, Plea Bargaining as a Solution for Criminal Case Backlog in Indonesia, International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(5), 282.
Naili Ariyani, Prospek Penerapan Konsep Plea Bargaining Dalam Upaya Pembaharuan Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia (Tinjauan Urgensi Perubahan Hukum Acara Pidana), Thesis, Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Rizky Novia Karolina, Kajian Hukum Terhadap Penerapan Pengakuan Bersalah Terdakwa Sebagai Justice Collaborator Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Pekanbaru Nomor 638/Pid.Sus/2016/PN Pbr), Jurnal Hukum.
Ruchoyah, 2018, Legal Problem Solving Penumpukan Perkara Pidana di Indonesia Melalui Pengadopsian Konsep Plea Bargaining Guna Mewujudkan Peradilan Pidana yang Efektif dan Efisien, Jurnal Legal Spirit, 2(2), 10.
Ziyad, Konsep Plea Bargaining Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang Merugikan Keuangan Negara, Jurnal Hukum.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang-undang Nomor 48 tahun 2009 tentang kekuasaan kehakiman
Rancangan Undang-Undang KUHAP Pasal 199
Website
Chairul Huda, Penerapan Mekanisme Small Claim Court, Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional (Perspektif Hukum Pidana), diakses pada www.bphn.go.id pada 20 september 2022.
http://www.lutfichakim.com, diakses pada 20 September 2022
http://www. mahkamahagung.go.id, diakses pada tanggal 20 September 2022
